Texas Supreme Court litigation reveals Trump challenges Biden’s victory

Texas Supreme Court litigation reveals Trump challenges Biden's victory

They are asking the Supreme Court to invalidate voters in four war zones, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, for an emergency order, even though there is no evidence of widespread fraud.

Critics of the president and his allies say the case reflects a bravery and legally dubious gamble to continue legal proceedings to prolong the unconstitutional claim that President-elect Joe Biden’s victory was somehow illegal.

Texas Attorney General Ken Pexton sued Tuesday. President on Wednesday Proposed to intervene – Originally a request to join the lawsuit, demanding the same result. Seventeen G.O.P. States are also supporting these efforts.

What does a Republican want?

Essentially, swinging in Trump’s election.

They are urging the court to block voters in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, and push back Biden under the magic of a 270-vote win.

The court must first allow Paxton to sue. The court will then have to block the Electoral Oral Ralph College Ledge’s vote certificate, determining that the four states allowed a large number of “illegal” votes, the states reconsidering their count and then resubmitting the numbers. Trump’s filing suggests that state legislators let each state decide who wins, or throw a full election to the U.S. House of Representatives, where each state’s delegation will have one vote – and the Republican delegation will win, rather than the number of democratic delegations.

Is there an example?


CNN Supreme Court analyst and University of Texas Law School professor Steve Vladeck said the president is briefly asking the Supreme Court to use its jurisdiction to effectively overturn the entire presidential election.

Rs 6 serv is fixed in the Supreme Court. Is this sure Trump will win?

No. The court has so far shown no desire to interfere in the presidential election.

On Tuesday, he rejected a request from a Pennsylvania Republican to disqualify the state’s presidency. He would issue a line and note zero disets. (Judges do not always have to make their case.)

See also  Edinburgh: what to see in the charming Scottish city

Trump has publicly suggested that he hopes his nominees – Amy Connie Barrett, Brett Cavanaho and Neil Gorschuch – will be with him on any election controversy. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Elito are also to be seen. He or she does not need justice to get him or her out of the dispute; Barrett, remarkably, did not re-admit himself in the Pennsylvania lawsuit.

When to hear from the court?

The Supreme Court is going through a standard procedure protocol, will put a case on it Docket And to give the State of the Four Wars by 3 p.m., Thursday, to answer.
The court can take action after those filings arrive or wait until Texas responds briefly to the arguments put forward by the battlefield states. The judges acted quickly Rejected Pennsylvania’s claim on TuesdayYes, but they can use their time in other election-related cases.

They “meet” on Fridays for their regular conference, which is now held over the phone.

Unlike a traditional sert petition (requesting a court to hear a case), it would take five judges to agree to allow Paxton to file his claim.

Then what

If the court refuses to prosecute, it’s another nail in the coffin in hopes of reversing Trump’s election losses.

If he acts in the other direction, it will be another dramatic and unprecedented turn in the 2020 election, the presidential guarantee, continuing to challenge Baden’s victory.

What is the original jurisdiction?

Paxton wants to file lawsuits against other states, and in such cases he is allowed to go directly to the Supreme Court.

The so-called “real jurisdiction” cases are almost exclusively for handling inter-state disputes, which cannot be resolved elsewhere, such as border disputes or water rights claims.

Trump is basically using Texas legal quotas to intervene in the lawsuit.

See also  Municipality: Swag, the Mayor of Padua Most Admired and Well-known

But while Texas is using the shortcut to the Supreme Court, judges must agree that it cannot be resolved in other courts – for example, federal or state courts.

“There’s nothing special about Texas’ claims here, most of which have already been made in other lawsuits against the same four states,” Vladek said, adding that if Trump and other states joined, it could weaken the Texas case. Unique.

Judges will be wary of opening the floodgates for all political disputes between states ending on their doc.

Benjamin Ginsberg, a longtime Republican election law expert and CNN contributor, told CNN on Wednesday that he did not think the court would consider taking the case “for a snap.”

Ginsberg said the G.O.P. “There would be a party for the right of the states.” I can’t even imagine the Texas Attorney General being less loyal to the principle of the right of states to try to tell other states how to conduct their elections. “

Sen., a senior Republican from Texas. John Korn told CNN: “I’m struggling to understand its legal doctrine. Number one, even a great state like Texas, how do you say what other states will say? Administer their election? We have scattered and scattered There is a system and even though we don’t like it, they think it’s inappropriate, it’s decided at the state and local level, not at the national level. “

What evidence do Trump and Republicans have?

The lawsuit alleges that state and federal courts have again and again denied time and time again in the past month regarding voter fraud and the legitimacy of mail-in voting.

Pexton wrote that “using the Covid-19 epidemic as a justification, the officers of the battlefield states” acquired the power of their legislature and unconstitutionally amended their state’s election law. He said they did so through “Executive Fiat”. He drew special attention to the mail-in ballot, which he said was placed in “drop boxes” of “a little or no chain of custody” which led to signature verification. And weakened the witness requirements, which he defended the integrity of “strong security measures. Vote.”

See also  Ofqual chief Sally Collier ways down just after exams chaos

Over the weeks the president has been pushing for more and more desperate appeals and baseless conspiracy theories about his second term being stolen.

GOP ready to accept Biden's victory  Senators, too, struggle with Trump's refusal to confess

“Our country is so divided that it hasn’t been argued since the 1860 election,” Trump’s motion on state intervention. “There is a high level of mistrust between the opposition parties, built on the fact that, in the recent elections, election officials in the major swing states failed to hold their state elections by complying with state election laws, clearly for partisan gain.”

Seventeen GOP-led states are backing Texas and the President: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Oklahoma, South. Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia.

Who are Trump’s new lawyers?

The presidential campaign is represented by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Attorney Jenna Ellis. At the current pace, however, Trump is represented by John Eastman.

Eastman has been known for recent Pushing a racist conspiracy theory – that Trump himself later amplified – claiming Vice President-elect Kamala Harris may not be eligible for the role because her parents were immigrants.
There is Trump, too GOP Sen. Asked Ted Cruz Texas – the state’s former solicitor general – hears oral arguments in the unlikely event of his submission to the Supreme Court.

CNN’s Jack Tapper, Kristin Wilson, Manu Raju and Daniel Diaz contributed to the report.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here