Ukrainian Arena and World War

Will the Third World War be sparked by Ukraine, as the Austrian land was the ignition site of the Second World War?
Amid the noise of the Middle East and its hot files, it seemed as if we are not seeing enough of the American-Russian scene on Ukrainian lands, with a degree of increasing danger, which is a moment of hot heads in a world. Can lead to war.
It is no secret that Washington, and ever since the Crimean peninsula has voted to secede from Ukraine and return to the Russian incubator, has become hostile to Russian President Vladimir Putin and is trying to change the situation and change the character Has been, no matter how much it is. Ukrainian-Russian confrontation.
On the second day of April, US President Joseph Biden made his first contact with his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, in which President Biden confirmed the United States’ firm support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, in the Russian invasion of the Donbas. On the face and. Crimea Peninsula, as he says.
Can the permit be considered an interference in the affairs of Russia?
Most probably, Moscow, which was present with a scenario of what is going on in its vicinity, especially in the light of direct calls to Ukraine’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dimitro Kuliba, for the United States, to practice For he called it “a specific and right move from the US administration”, and then he is one of the main expectations for Ukraine. It is a more effective and immediate American partnership, which is important in ending the occupation of Donbas and Crimean The peninsula.
Therefore, it is a clear call for direct US military intervention in areas formally under Russian sovereignty, which would lead the confrontations to higher, more dangerous, and warmer levels.
The interesting and disturbing thing about the Ukrainian Chessboard movement is that as soon as Biden ended his call with Zelensky, the Ukrainian army began intensive bombing on the Donbas republics.
The rapid incidents are indeed insane, and no one knows how such a statement could be issued by the US Defense Minister Lloyd Austin, who called his Ukrainian counterpart on 1 April, and was in a position of Ukraine. The US provided a guarantee to support military conflict with Russia, while the American leadership raised its level of readiness to the highest level in Europe.
Does NATO ask Russia’s political analyst Alexander Najarov that next May is the date for the attack on Russia?
Last Wednesday evening, US Joint Chiefs of Staff President General Mark Mile spoke on the phone with the commander in chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Ruslan Khomchak, and the Russian Army’s General Staff Chief, Valery Gerasimov.
It did not appear in the news what had happened between the three, but the surveillance that had been carried out over the past few days indicated military equipment on both sides that predicted that no moment could be expected. .
Several weeks before the aforementioned contact, the American and British reconnaissance had shown intense activity to the unmanned action lines over the Donas, and to a large extent the same thing happened along the peninsula across the border.
Meanwhile, the pace of the “NATO” maneuver, known as the “Defender of Europe”, is being moved to the Black Sea region, allowing the United States to transfer approximately 1,200 units of military equipment to Europe.
With a deep peace, and a clear and sharp determination to the fullest extent and extent, the Russian response is visible to the world, as commented by the Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, on Friday, in the presence of US forces There was a hint of possibility. Ukrainian land saying that it is “unacceptable and unacceptable. It is justified.” “If this scenario happens, it will increase tensions near the Russian borders,” he said.
Moscow seems to follow the example of US President Theodore Roosevelt (1901 – 1909), who “spoke of peace and held a heavy stick”, as it had already begun to move the Russian army, including Sending several regiments and military units to the Crimea Peninsula, and to the borders with Ukraine.
Washington did not leave Russia to question the Russians’ intentions after these moves, prompting the Kremlin to declare that Russia moved its armed forces independently within and within the borders of its territory, and would not let anyone in There is no interest in interfering in matters and internal issues.
Russia appears to be protecting its internal borders, but at the same time it sends a message to the Ukrainian neighbor and the people behind it, especially if some have deployed missiles near Russia.
Does Washington have the luxury of embarking on a military adventure that can lead to global war, while it is living a fierce war due to a disillusioned economy with a bad virus and trillions of debts?
No one has a satisfactory answer, while there are apprehensions that everyone will get in the way of a snowball landscape rolling up a mountain … so see what you see?