In Scotland, hunters and wildlife management experts wrote a letter to Times (who published this) To answer the nonsense that reached Parliament to invite them to replace the rural landscape of the Moors (the infinite expanse of heather) with more profitable and less polluting agricultural solutions: the burning of the heather The true heritage of the region, which is contested to favor the grouse, seems more appetizing.
A problem that can be largely addressed by periodically pruning bushes as an alternative to burning. Accused of producing too much carbon, hunters recall that 92% of the carbon that is released into the atmosphere does not depend on highlands but on other crops, pastures and agriculture. Whereas Heather Moore releases only 0.6 percent of it.
“These are visited by millions of people every year, they are better protected and protected by people who are willing to invest their money to manage them,” says Moore. To protect the population of Gross. We must also not forget that these are the same landlords who have refused to accept government grants for decades to cover these beautiful hills with trees or to till them for agriculture. If they did, their carbon emissions would now be 150 times higher. Maybe it’s time to take pride in our national parks and the contribution Grouse has made to fight climate change. “
Big Hunter Editorial Team. notice to commenters
A reason to have fun and meet and share, along with commenting on the news, can serve to better expand the news, but there should be respect and responsibility for others not to run away. Unfortunately, we have noticed that comparisons between frequent users on our portal, with daily comments on the extent of indecency, force us to reflect and take a stand. We are no longer willing to tolerate disrespect and manipulation of this portal with bogus comments to destabilize constructive and civil dialogue. We remind you that we allow this space for the sole purpose of commenting on published news, (still for free time but we will take appropriate measures soon). So from now on we will remove any comment that doesn’t respect the proposed topic or contains offense or derogatory or obscene words.
Here are additional rules:
1 Comment only on the topic proposed in the news.
2 Avoid insults, offense and hate speech, even if directed at other commenters on the news.
3 Don’t use capital letters or use it sparingly (equivalent to shouting)
4 Respect the opinions of others, even if they differ from yours.
5 Always sign with the same identifying surname and do not use author space inappropriately (for example, signing sentences with laughs, punctuation, etc., or writing the surname of others)
Thank you to those who will follow our rules.
Devoted problem solver. Tv advocate. Avid zombie aficionado. Proud twitter nerd. Subtly charming alcohol geek.
